Why politician don’t like educated peoples

Why politician don’t like educated peoples

Politics is the power to influence people. It is a special power of influence that humans exercise over one another. A gun can be powerful, but its power is only physical until a human takes control, and then the power of the gun changes from physical to political.

Politics is the process by which individual interests or desires are reconciled with collective action and the provision of public goods. Politics is the process by which we determine what unique public good we will achieve, even if each has a very different set of individual interests. In state policy, public property that the state provides protection and expenses for it. The government must participate in the disturbance by wanting protection to protect us from external powers, to protect us from each other.

As ordinary people, we are always thinking about political issues like raising or lowering taxes, whether drugs are illegal or legalized, whether they are illegal, what the sanctions should be, if the federal government sets drug rules or if that is left to the states in case they invaded this country or not, if we invaded a country but not that, it should be this instead, we should only invade that type of country

Politics is a discipline born in ancient Greece. Aristotle's policy contains the famous phrase "man is a political animal" meaning that it is our nature to live in society and to have power over each other.

The history of the Peloponnesian War began, a quite different tradition, Aristotle examined the realities of power, the relations between states on horseback. The strong person can do whatever he wants and the weak suffer what they have to. In this way, a division was born which continues even today.

The philosophers of domestic politics building a land of rules and the philosophers of international relations mapping out what seems to be a revolution in a world where there is neither recognized leadership nor guaranteed recourse to the law.

More than a millennium later, the birth of liberalism forever changed the face of political thought. Social contract theorists such as Thomas Hobbes John Locke and Jean-Jacques Rousseau have reflected on the way power is exercised in their societies, in which Kings claimed it was their right to govern. If peoples want to be control, then government would be the only legitimate, as a result, these thinkers have overthrown the political world over their heads of government, who they say do not automatically have the right to govern, but the people have the right to be governed in the way they choose.

This liberal conception of power relations defines a large part of our world, even today, or is politics the most interesting when it is in debate. The library contains dozens of examples of authors who have clashed.

Reflections by Thomas Paine, human rights and Edmund Burke on the revolution in France. It reflects two different perspectives, on the basic ideas of liberal thinking and asking if the people are truly the ultimate sovereign force in the country. We also examine two contrasting worldviews in the wake of the Cold War Francis Fukuyama, the end of history, a liberal world order, united in prosperity and peace. Samuel Huntington's "clash of civilizations" predicted a world full of resentment at the apparent triumph of liberalism and more prone to conflict than ever taken together.

These and other analyzes in the library tell the story not only of the rise of liberalism but also of the challenges to its prevalence. You will find revolutionary theoretical analyzes in the Macat analysis which invented the study of international relations in the 21st century. International relations specialists want to understand the fundamental forces that shape international politics. They are trying to be scientists in the Thucydides tradition, trying to develop predictive theories based on real evidence.

All the citizens of the country should self-assess and try to re-imbibe the moral values ​​which we have lost. Poisoning of black marketing, bribery, corruption, nepotism, casteism and communalism is spreading everywhere in the country.

Allegations of corruption have been made from time to time from a general employee to top leaders. Criminalization in the country's politics is increasing day by day. In the longing for the chair or post, the sage is ridiculing all moral values. 'Yen-ken-type' he tries to achieve it.

But the entry of criminal elements in India's politics has not taken place in a single day. The way the winning struggle for the chair started after independence, all parties began to reject the Gandhian view of purity of means to establish their supremacy, they played a leading role in forming the nexus of politics and crime. This process was also encouraged in the name of eradicating casteism.

There is a need to find the cause of the increasing criminalization and find the diagnosis. First of all, we find that the electoral process of our country also needs to be improved. Money and power dominate our Indian politics. According to an estimate, generally more than 90 percent of our leaders either belong to highly wealthy families or they are related to criminal elements. Quality has never been the basis of our election process.

Now, the meaning of word “politician” is completely changed and it become Powerful who has the authority to make all changes without concerning to public, authority to do anything that they want. It becomes the trend that you come in front of peoples only in the vent of election, promise all in favor of public and then forget everything after electing. Politicians are aware about the weakness of public and when the peoples are illiterate then it is very easy to make fool them.

Uneducated and poor people don’t know the law, the regulations, what the economy is, how subsidies can affect the growth of the economy, why the security of the country is so important, etc. Uneducated and poor people are only interested in their temporary benefits, they always think about how much tax discount, how many benefits they will get on subsidized products, etc. If a state government distributes free cellphones, free laptops, free water, free electricity, etc., uneducated and poor people are very exciting and very happy. Even in a pre-election campaign, when the politician simply promises the public that once elected, he will provide free electricity to all people, then the people become very happy and all vote to get elected.

The poor and uneducated peoples are interested in temporary and instant benefit and that is why everyone can deceive them, they are unable to think about the economy, the law, the importance of the country's growth, the importance of national security and that is why politicians loved this type of people because after being elected by them the poor, they have nothing to do for the country. They just appreciate their victory over foolish people.

This is the main reason why politicians loved the poor. This is one of the reasons why politicians are against educating people. Once people are educated, the politician can no longer make fun of them.